The industry levy: £25 million would be a more appropriate target for the annual contribution of the British gambling industry to research and treatment.

The new Responsible Gambling Trust, the Gambling Commission, and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport Committee, have all suggested that we should view the £5 million now contributed annually by the gambling industry as a success, indeed something that the nation should be proud of. Gambling Watch UK sees it differently. Let's leave aside the question of whether a levy on the gambling industry is the appropriate way to fund gambling research and treatment – Gambling Watch UK believes it is not. If, for now, that is to be the way that the study and treatment of the harm caused by gambling is to be funded, then what is a reasonable target for the industry levy? How was £5 million annually agreed upon? Presumably it was as a result of some behind closed doors negotiation during which arguments about how difficult life was for the industry (see the recent report of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport Committee for considerable evidence of such arguments being used) and how little they could afford were important contributors.

£5 million, as everyone knows, is a very small amount of money to address any problem on a national scale. It is also very small as a fraction of total British gambling industry takings. According to Gambling Commission Industry Statistics for 2010-11, Gross Gambling Yield (GGY), for all forms of gambling regulated by the Gambling Commission combined, amounts to approximately £5.6 billion. The current £5 million target for the levy therefore represents about a tenth of one percent of GGY. If the levy target was to be based on industry takings, what is a reasonable percentage? One way of arriving at a figure would be to base the percentage on the estimate of the British adult gambling problem prevalence produced by the most recent, 2010, British Gambling Prevalence Survey. The two separate estimates produced by that survey were 7 and 9 per thousand of the population. Taking the average of those two figures, it could be argued that it would be reasonable for the levy target to be set at 0.8% of GGY. That would suggest a levy target of approximately £45 million, getting on for 10 times the present target.

An alternative basis for arriving at a target could be an estimate of the percentage of GGY which secondary analysis of the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey data has suggested is contributed by people with gambling problems (see Because people with gambling problems spend more than the average, this percentage is much higher than the prevalence estimate, although it varies greatly by type of gambling (from around 5% for bingo and football pools gambling to around 25% for betting on dog races and playing Fixed Odds Betting Machines). In total the best estimate is that around 14% of takings on forms of gambling regulated by the Gambling Commission come from people with gambling problems, which translates into a staggering £780 million annually?

Gambling industry profits are of course only a certain proportion of GGY, after subtracting taxes, duties, licences and operating costs. In 2000 KPMG, in its report for Business in Sport and Leisure, estimated that British gambling industry profits were approximately 18% of GGY (excluding the National Lottery and non-profit-making forms of gambling). Total profits may therefore be of the order of £1bn of which 14%, or £140m may be coming from the pockets of people with gambling problems.

Whichever method is used, the present target of £5 million is put into proper perspective. Not only is it a pitifully small amount in relation to research and treatment needs, but it also represents a tiny proportion of the gross yield from gambling and nowhere near what is reasonable in relation to the prevalence of problem gambling and the percentage of industry profits coming from people with gambling problems. Our rough calculations have suggested figures of £45m and £140m both of which are so far in excess of the present target that they would certainly be unacceptable. As a compromise, Gambling Watch UK suggests a target of £25 million, to be achieved over the next five years. This is five times the present target, and seems to Gambling Watch UK to be much nearer to a figure which could really be called a success and something the British could be proud of.

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Completely agree the target is more like £25m. This would be a realistic sum to find appropriate levels of treatment etc in the UK

Robin Burgess
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

This is a very good point that Lee makes and certainly not naive. You are right, much the best thing would be if government took proper responsibility for funding gambling research, education and treatment completely independently of the gambling...

This is a very good point that Lee makes and certainly not naive. You are right, much the best thing would be if government took proper responsibility for funding gambling research, education and treatment completely independently of the gambling industry. Alternatives would be for the industry levy, currently voluntary, to be made mandatory, and for the body which distributes the money to be one which is fully independent of the industry (which the Responsible Gambling Trust is most decidedly not). The point that our piece was trying to make was simply that, given the present unsatisfactory arrangements, its size (£5 million a year) is pitifully small and nothing to be proud about. It would be interesting to hear other views about whether Gambling Watch UK should be campaigning for the target to be raised (up to perhaps £25 million a year) or whether, as Lee suggests, we should be campaigning rather for the whole system of funding to be changed.

Read More
Gambling Watch UK administrator
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

im shocked that a company whose mission statement is " to question the present policy of support for the expansion of gambling in the UK. Its members believe that the expansion of gambling is harmful from a public health perspective." So why is...

im shocked that a company whose mission statement is " to question the present policy of support for the expansion of gambling in the UK. Its members believe that the expansion of gambling is harmful from a public health perspective." So why is this artical arguing for more money from the levy? surely your contradicting yourself here by asking for more money from the industry your trying to stop growing! your saying more money from bookmakers, this will force bookies to open longer, push more offers, open even more stores. forgive me if i sound naive but this is my view on this matter

Read More
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Latest UK News

Gambling industry fails to answer calls for controls during the virus crisis

14 Apr 2020

I was one of 12 academics and doctors who sent a letter to the Times last week calling for a suspension of gambling advertising during the crisis. Twenty...

Are betting companies taking advantage of the coronavirus crisis?

28 Mar 2020

Betting companies, like so many others, are facing uncertainty created by the coronavirus crisis. Will their profits decrease or, because people are confined...

New book on gambling is a must-read

24 Mar 2020

Rebecca Cassidy 2020 Vicious Games: Capitalism and Gambling. London: Pluto Press. No one knows better than Rebecca Cassidy the way in which betting has...

Gambling company sponsorship of football – What should be done?

09 Mar 2020

Following the announcement of a ban on the use of credit cards for gambling in the UK from April, the spotlight is now on the Government to see how quickly it...

Gambling Commission’s industry groups on safer gambling: a conflict of interests

07 Feb 2020

The Gambling Commission is setting up three industry-led working groups to help take forward its ‘drive to make gambling safer’ (see GC newsletter 27 January...

Betting companies admit that a huge percentage of ‘deposits’ come from a few customers

07 Feb 2020

The five big betting companies have admitted, for the first time, under questioning from members of the House of Lords Select Committee on gambling harm, that...

Gambling with credit cards banned from April

22 Jan 2020

After holding a consultation, the Gambling Commission has decided to ban gambling operators accepting payment with credit cards, starting on April 14th. At...

NHS England blames the gambling industry for gambling addiction and plans new gambling clinics

08 Jan 2020

‘The NHS is facing a rising tide of gambling related ill health’, says NHS England. Their data show the number of gambling related hospital admissions has...

Pub allows under 18s to use gambling machines and loses its permit

19 Dec 2019

For the first time a British pub has been stripped of its permit to have gambling machines on its premises (Gambling Commission 16 December 2019). Redbridge...

Parliamentary group lambasts online gambling

05 Dec 2019

The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Gambling Related Harm (APPG-GRH) has produced an Interim Report into the Online Gambling Sector which does not mince...

Political parties pledge gambling reform

05 Dec 2019

All four main political parties going into the December 12th general election make specific mention of gambling in their manifestos. Congratulations to...

'The Gambling Establishment' is published - a must read

18 Sep 2019

An important new book will be out in a few days time: The Gambling Establishment: Challenging the Power of the Modern Gambling Industry and Its Allies, by Jim...

The tide is turning against the gambling industry

09 Aug 2019

Great BBC TV programme available online at from 4 July 2019. Comedian Lloyd Griffith fails to double his money during a week of gambling,...

Gambling with Lives launch shows the tide is turning

17 Nov 2018

Tuesday this week, 13th November 2018, was the launch of Gambling with Lives (GwL) at the Houses of Parliament. The event was extremely well attended by...

Gambling with Lives

16 Aug 2018

Gambling with Lives (GwL) is a new group started by the parents of a young man with a gambling addiction who committed suicide. They are naturally grief...

FOBT Stake Cut to £2 Maximum

17 May 2018

The Government has at last seen sense and done what we and so many others have been asking for. Today it has announced it is bringing the maximum stake per...

What do you think about online gambling marketing: Gambling Commission wants to know

13 Feb 2018

The Gambling Commission (GC) has announced that it is working with the Competition and Markets Authority to make sure that online gambling companies bring...

Gambling: a big public health problem neglected

15 Sep 2017

The Gambling Commission has just published a summary of British survey findings for 2015. The results are not new but this is the first time they have put...

Are we seeing a backlash against liberalised commercial gambling?

05 Jun 2017

I have seen a couple of signs just recently that the tide might be turning against the establishment assumption that a strong, innovating and widely...

Gambling problems are costing Government hundreds of millions

13 Jan 2017

An important report came out at the end of 2016. This was from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), an influential and progressive British...

What shall we say to the Government enquiry on Fixed Odds Betting Terminals?

07 Nov 2016

Good news! Well maybe, let’s wait and see what the actual outcome is. But we do welcome the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) putting out a...

Honest admissions by prominent gambling establishment figure

11 Aug 2016

Gambling Commission’s former Chair talks at the Royal Society of Arts (RSA)   Following his five years as Chair of the Gambling Commission, Philip Graf was...

Support Gambling Watch UK

Together we can make a difference

We believe there is overwhelming support for the view that there are already too many opportunities for gambling and that this is bad for individual, family and community health, but our voices need to be heard if we are to influence public policy..

Click here to register your support